patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Race Between Sheila Harsdorf and Shelly Moore Could Be Tightest Recall Election in Wisconsin

Also in the news, Sen. Harsdorf votes in favor of legislation to extend unemployment benefits, and Sen. Johnson reacts to S&P's announcement that they would downgrade the U.S. credit rating.

 

The polls are set to open tomorrow, but it's anyone's guess who will win in the Senate District 10 recall election between Republican Sen. Sheila Harsdorf and Democratic challenger Shelly Moore.

Polls for the district have generally leaned toward Harsdorf, although the gap has gotten increasingly closer between the two. 

First there was a poll by Public Policy Polling that had Moore at 5 percentage points behind, followed by a more recent poll by the Mellman Group, sponsored by the Democrats, that had Moore 3 points behind.

Meanwhile, WisPolitics has District 10 listed as leaning toward Harsdorf.

However, history reminds us that polls don't always pan out the way they should come election day, as was the case in the 1948 Presidential election between New York Gov. Thomas Dewey and Harry Truman.

Neither candidate seems intimidated by the polls. Moore told the Hudson Patch "I feel very confident going into Tuesday. Voters all over the district have rejected Senator Harsdorf's radical agenda. This race is a dead heat. We've run a strong grassroots campaign and I'm very confident going into Tuesday."

Harsdorf seems to have a similar confidence level going into the election. She commented that "we are the underdogs against a national union machine that has spent over $9.7 million in Wisconsin.  With that said, I believe voters wanted us to end the irresponsible tax-and-spend policies that were bankrupting taxpayers. Fundamentally, people understand that to get our fiscal house in order, tough choices needed to be made, and they realize that outside special interests are driving the recall campaign. Ultimately the outcome of the election will be determined by those who take the time to vote."

One thing that is certain, the primary on July 12 between Shelly Moore and "protest" candidate Issac Weix was the closest in the state.

While the other five true Democratic candidates in Wisconsin swept their primaries with anywhere from 64 percent to 70 percent of the primary vote, Moore won by only 8 percent, with 54 percent of District 10 voting in her favor.

Even given the primary results, Moore remains confident for Tuesday's election, commenting that "I think the most recent polling is an indication of how close this election will be. Every poll that has been done recently shows this race in a statistical tie. Turnout will be high, just like it was in the primary, but high turnout is not a concern to me at all. Momentum is on our side."

Harsdorf, however, believes the primary turnout could be an indication of broad support for her candidacy.

Harsdorf noted that "there are a number of people out there, including Democrats and independents, who think this recall campaign is wrong. I think many of them expressed their opposition to this recall campaign last month, and it may be an indicator of what is to come."

In any event, tomorrow's historic recall election will likely have a huge turn out, and District 10 may be the tightest race in Wisconsin.

The Hudson Patch gave both candidates the opportunity to deliver one final message to the voters before Tuesday.

Shelly Moore:

"I am running for State Senate because I want to restore fair representation to the people of the 10th Senate District. I believe that everyone—including public employees—should do their part to balance the budget. I will not subscribe to the radical Harsdorf/Walker agenda that raises taxes on Wisconsin's working families and seniors, while giving tax breaks to huge corporations. This is not fiscally responsible, and it's not the Wisconsin way. Senator Harsdorf has proven time and time again that she won't listen to the people of the 10th Senate District. It's time for new leadership."

Sen. Sheila Harsdorf:

"I am not being recalled because I did anything wrong, but because I did what I was elected to do—balance the state budget without raising taxes while reforming how government works. The subsequent recall campaign is being financed and driven by big spending special interests intent on exacting political payback. If these recall elections succeed, it will be a dangerous precedent for the relationship between government and taxpayers. It is critical that we continue growing jobs and putting people back to work. Our state has added nearly 40,000 jobs since the beginning of the year. The reforms are already working."

You can follow all the Wisconsin recall election news on our sibling AOL property—The Huffington Post. HuffPo has a live blog going of all the news and notes about recall campaigns across the state. Check out the live blog

Also, don't miss our election night coverage. We'll keep you updated as precincts report their vote totals and both campaigns hold their election night gatherings. Liveblog coverage will begin once the polls close at 8 p.m. on Tuesday, Aug. 9.

----

Rep. Dean Knudson (R-District 30)

Sen. Sheila Harsdorf (R-District 10)

  • The Wisconsin State Senate is not currently in session, it is set to reconvene Sept. 13.
  • On Monday, Aug. 1, Sen. Harsdorf voted in favor of SB 147. The legislation seeks to extend 13 additional weeks of unemployment benefits to the long term unemployed in Wisconsin.
  • On Thursday, Aug. 4, Sen. Harsdorf appeared on Wisconsin Public Radio's The West Side in her third, and final, debate with recall challenger Shelly Moore.
  • On Sunday, Aug. 7, Sen. Harsdorf appeared on KSTP TV's political show At Issue. Both she and Moore appeared in separately pre-recoreded segments.
  • Harsdorf has no committee meetings scheduled for the week.

Rep. Ron Kind (D-WI)

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI)

  • On Tuesday, Aug. 2, Sen. Johnson voted against S. 365, the Budget Control Act of 2011. The legislation passed the Senate with a 74-26 vote. In a press release, Johnson stated that "last November, the American people sent a very clear message to Washington to get America's fiscal house in order. The fact that we are debating how to reduce the growth of government is a good thing, and the Budget Control Act is a step in the right direction. But it is simply inadequate, and my ‘no’ vote is my way of acknowledging that we simply must do more."
  • On Thursday, Aug. 4, Sen. Johnson signed a joint letter encouraging transparency from the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction. In a press release, Johnson commented that "the American people ought to be concerned that Congress has decided not to address our spending crisis through the legislative process: by adopting a budget and then sticking to it. Instead Congress has created a special committee that short-circuits debate and avoids real accountability. The least we should expect is for that committee to do its business in the open." Read the full text of the letter here.
  • On Saturday, Aug. 6, Sen. Johnson put out a statement in response to the announcement that Standard & Poor's (S&P) would downgrade the long term credit rating for the U.S. Johnson said that "S&P's downgrade of US Debt to AA+, together with the recent plunge in stock prices, provide further evidence that President Obama's agenda has been a disaster for our economy. No one denies President Obama came into office facing tough economic conditions, but the policies of his Administration have made matters far worse."
  • Tweet of the week:"Our borrowing surpassed 100% of our GDP yesterday for the first time since 1947. Time is running out to find a solution."
  • Johnson has no committee meetings scheduled for the week.

Sen. Herb Kohl (D-WI)

  • On Tuesday, Aug. 2, Sen. Kohl voted in favor of S. 365, the Budget Control Act of 2011. The legislation passed the Senate with a 74-26 vote. In a press statement, Kohl noted that "this plan is a compromise that will put us on the path to debt and deficit reduction. It is far better than what would have been the catastrophe of a default, which would have done enormous damage to every family and business in our state and nation. Once this is behind us, we need to return immediately to the most important job, getting our people back to work and getting the economy back on track." The bill has already been signed into law by President Obama.
  • On Thursday, Aug. 4, Kohl put out a new blog post on Patch, Working For The Consumer.
  • WisPolitics reports that on Saturday, Aug. 6, Sen. Kohl, along with Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, joined Rep. Fred Clark in Baraboo to encourage support for Clark in his recall attempt against Sen. Luther Olsen (R-14). Rep. Clark and Sen. Olsen will square off the recall election this Tuesday, August 9. 
  • Kohl has no committee meetings scheduled for the week.
Related Topics: Capitol Review, Dean Knudson, Herb Kohl, Ron Johnson, Ron Kind, Sheila Harsdorf, Shelly Moore, and Wisconsin State Senate
Who do you think will win in tomorrow's recall election, Republican Sen. Sheila Harsdorf or Democratic challenger Shelly Moore? Tell us in the comments.

Bewildered

7:35 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

Nice to see all pollls ( including Dems own) picks Moore to lose by 3-5%. Of course the Moore campaign Is downplaying polling. And I'm sure all the lefty posters on Patch will come up with 100s of reason why the polls are wrong and/or can't be trusted. Imaging their comments if their side was picked to win! A whole lota crowing would be going on vs. the lefty damage control spin that's sure to be coming. Sure, tomorrow will answer all the questions, but just saying, nice to be predicted the winner at this late stage. Don't make your reservations to the Moore victory party too early folks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

William Welbes

3:53 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

Actually you miss the point shelly has already won. The voting base has been activated and Walker is next. All shelly had to do was wake up the base. A close vote in St. Croix a repulican stronghold makes it harder for walker to prevail. Regardless of how the election goes. It puts Walker in a poor position.

William Welbes

9:32 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

Wasnt more than a month ago that people on patch were claiming Sheila would win 60% of the vote to shellys 40%. Moore has come a long way in what is normally a very solid republican district. Just shows how bad people want walker gone. Most polls have a 5% margin of error so shelly may squeak out a win. It will be interesting.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hudsoner

9:40 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

Shelly Moore's achievmnt is even more of an accomplishment if want considers that she is running agaqinst a 20 year in office incumbend! A zero name recognition candidate against the political icon in District 10!

Comment_arrow

Shannon

9:45 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

W & H - Agreed. A year ago, no one would've thought Sheila would ever be in danger of not winning an election in SD10. A lot of people are unhappy with her job performance.

Comment_arrow

Hudsoner

10:05 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

And her talk that she is recalled unfairly because she just did her job, is a mute one! Just doing a job is not good enough, it has to be the right job very well done. They always try to convince voters that employees of private companies are not as well off as are gov't. employees. At least in one point she is right, if a private company is not doing the job well, they are fired, and that is the reason that we apply private company rules to her, we want to fire her for a poorly done job!

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

10:43 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

Hudsoner, the "achievmnt" you speak about relates to the fact that all those union workers finally got off the butts and worked for a candidate. Till Moore showed up, the union participation in local campaigns was like Bigfoot...there was a lot of talk about the union and election campaigns, but nobody actually saw them invovled in the campaigns.

Comment_arrow

William Welbes

11:31 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

JPN- Why do you keep blameing unions? Unions account for 14% of the total states workforce and there are only 38 total public workers for every 1000 workers in the state and many of those are not union. Nationally unions account for less than 13% of the total workforce. To blame a clear minority for a majority position just does not make sense. Actually what you are seeing are the independents and a growing group of disaffected republicans joining ranks for a common good. If Sheila had remained a moderate republican instead of suddenly jumping into the tea party wagon she probably would not be in this position. I suspect the tea party involvement in the debt rating drop will cause even more to flee the republican party. It is going to be an interesting tuesday. Like my republican grandfather used to say vote early and vote often. Not really sure what he meant by that.

Comment_arrow

Hudsoner

12:21 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

JPN, when you are right, you are right! But it reaches even farther, it activated me and many others like me, who have never been involved with political parties, unions or state employment!

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

12:33 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

WW, please point out where I blamed unions. Don't know what invlovement you've had in the campaigns to get Democrats elected locally, but the union members put very little effort into those cmapaigns -- Bigfoot. I certainly don't blame unions for the state of our economy. I blame the Democrats and Repulbican politicians and the people who sit out the elections and suddenly get their oxes gored and realize voting matters.

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

12:35 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

Shannon:

A year ago there would have been 3-5 Democratic protesters at the TEA Party rally. Had Harsdorf run last fall whe would have beat her opponent by a 60-40 margin.

Comment_arrow

Thurston Howell III

1:19 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

JPN, Help me figure out where you reply to what here. If could be so bold as to try to interpret your Republican Grandfather's comment of "Vote Early, vote often" into modern day GOP speak, I think he might be suggesting that these voter suppression tactics of the Republicans would be the way to go. I mean , since you can't literally "vote often" the next best thing is to make your vote count more by getting the other guy to just not vote.

Thurston Howell III

10:18 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

There's only ONE poll that counts. It's call an election. I could say more but............

Reply

Jim Bob

10:39 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

TH3: Are you sure the elctions actually count anymore? Appears we had elections in November of 2010 and the results of those elections led to these recall elections.

I wonder how many people voting in tomorrow's election didn't even vote last November?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Thurston Howell III

12:08 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

JPN, If people were too apathetic to vote in the Fall of 2010, and are now more engaged in the electoral process, then the Recalls have served a genuine public service. It you're insinuating that the recalls shouldn't be taking place at all, as many mistakenly do, you may want to see if Dean Knudson and Sheila Harsdorf would be interested in starting the process of Amending Wisconsin's State Constitution.

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

12:41 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

I'm not against the recall elections. I don't think we'd have them if Walker had come and double the taxes on the rich, increase teachers' pay and benefit package, etc.

Since we have the private unions working with the public unions in this elections, I wonder if we can expect to see the public unions helping out their SEIU brothers and sisters get better wages and benefits for the low level service jobs?

Comment_arrow

Hudsoner

1:06 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

JPN, if Walker would have increase taxes on the rich, etc., and nobody would have rallied against this, could be due to the fact that "we the people" could have thought that such an increase would have spread the pain more evenly?

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

3:02 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

Hudsoner, could you refresh my memory on why we are having a recall election? I keep thinking it is because of the changes related public unions. Are there more reasons than this? Is it ok to be a Democratic and be opposed to these recall elections?

Thurston Howell III

10:42 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

I heard the Tea Party Express speakers talk a lot about unity. I'm pretty sure that was code for "My way or the Highway!" Tea Partiers , fight amongst your selves. I'll give you a topic. Other Tea Partiers. http://www.youtube.com/user/OurCountryPAC#p/a/f/4/ajT9IgL7SG8

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hudsoner

12:24 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

Who is the "right" Tea Party and who are the imposters? They all look like Tea Bags to me!

Thurston Howell III

11:08 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

My new friend from San Diego, Howard Kaloogian, should get out his non-union paint brush, and change the name on that $1/2 Million dollar vehicle to the Howard Kaloogian Gravy Train!

Reply

Thurston Howell III

11:09 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

Here's a little bit of background on my new friend from San Diego! http://youtu.be/pqcdx0LbvxM

Reply

FREE STUFF

11:21 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

VOTE FOR MOORE FREE STUFF - TAX THE WORKERS! (MAKE THEM PAY) - GO UNIONS !!!

Reply

Thurston Howell III

11:45 am on Monday, August 8, 2011

For More Baloney visit the Free Stuff Gravy Train Tour:

Reply

FREE STUFF

12:00 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

WE NEED A UNION/BIG GOVERNMENT 'YES' PERSON REPRESENTING US!!! BELIEVE ME SHELLY WILL VOTE WHATEVER THE UNIONS TELL HER TO! GO SHELLY !!!!!!

Reply

Thurston Howell III

12:14 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

According to Amy Kremer, one of the fearless leaders of the Tea Party express, they have a lot of Obama hating work to do before 2012. I only wish they would do it somewhere local and leave us alone. http://youtu.be/FBQtqBKTv1c

Reply

Infidel Democrat

2:19 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

Just remember this - as Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said in June "We own the economy. We own the beginning of the turnaround and we want to make sure that we continue that pace of recovery, not go back to the policies of the past under the Bush administration that put us in the ditch in the first place". The economy, she said, “has turned around” since President Obama took office, with steady job growth evident even if the pace leaves something to be desired. So I say, lets continue the progress people - vote tuesday!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bewildered

2:45 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

With the Dow down over 500 today, 20% off the years high, and unemployment well above 9% despite the president,s promise that the stimulus package would brring unemployment below 8%, not so sure Mr. Obama wants to hang his hat on this one. Look for him to try and distance himself from Congress. Here's a little factoid to chew on, in last 70 years, no standing president, Dem or Repub , has won reelection with unemployment over 8 %.

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

2:56 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

Kind of reminds of Bush and the "Mission Accomplished" banner. A case of premature speculation, no doubt...

Bewildered

3:01 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

You must be hiding under a rock to call this " speculation". Either that or have all your savings under your mattress.

Reply
Comment_arrow

William Welbes

3:57 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

Ust thank the Tea Party Standard and Poor warned them this would happen if they didnt put revenue increases into the budget bill. Nope instead they passed something doesent even really cut the budget for years, and they passed on a real chance to start working down the deficit. Either they are incredibly naieve or they really hate the country.

SAM

3:03 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

TH III, Thanks for introducing us to Howard. We won't see this info in the Republican Hudson Star Observer, will we?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Thurston Howell III

6:21 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

No Sam, we don't. I was actually shocked, because my new friend Howard seemed like a reasonable person, when I was shaking hands with him. Little did I know that he was a professional Bamboozler with the Tea Party Express being his own little personal "Wealth Generator and piggy Bank.
Howard_Kaloogian
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/legendary_gop_bamboozler_hitches_wagon_to_tea_part.php

Comment_arrow

Thurston Howell III

6:26 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

I think it's important to remember that our "Representative" Dean Knudson has tied his wagon to these folks. And Sheila Hardorf is in his side car. For the people who were not at the Bandshell "Tea Party Express" festivities. Here's a little clip of my friend Howard, from SAN DIEGO. CA!! Some people say that would mean he's a POWERFUL OUTSIDE INTEREST. I'm just sayin'... http://youtu.be/pqcdx0LbvxM

Comment_arrow

Shannon

6:37 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

What you will see in the HSO is a big ad for Sheila Harsdorf. So much for objective reporting.

Comment_arrow

Bewildered

8:57 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

TH, as you are against "outside interests" at the TP rally, do you feel the same way about the "outside interests" at the Madison rallies this spring? Michael Moore, Jessie Jackson, the national head of AFL/CIO and all the out of state celebs ( singers, Hollywood actors, athletes) ?

Comment_arrow

Bewildered

9:23 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

So the HSO is branded for accepting paid ads now (at least repub ads). Seems like a pretty non objective point of view by S to me.

Comment_arrow

Thurston Howell III

9:30 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Bewildered: You said: "TH, as you are against "outside interests" at the TP rally, do you feel the same way about the "outside interests" at the Madison rallies this spring? Michael Moore, Jessie Jackson, the national head of AFL/CIO and all the out of state celebs ( singers, Hollywood actors, athletes) ?"

I'm against the hypocrisy of Sheila Harsdorf whining about outside interests supporting her opponent. When she has the American's for Prosperity, and the Tea Party express visiting our back yard. Also why do Harsdorf and Knudson contantly refer to the fake news organization "The MacIver Insitute?. Because they are a front for the Koch Brothers. The MacIver's are WI's own Fox News.

Comment_arrow

Bewildered

9:48 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

TH, still didn't answer the question. Are you personally against all outside interests? Seems like it by your comments. If so, you must be bothered by both parties.

Comment_arrow

Thurston Howell III

9:57 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Bewildered. I'm probably like you. I'm more against the Outside interests that hurt my interests. I'll bet you're the same way right? If I were to be "objective", I would be outraged at both sides, correct. Actually I think most people are.Unfortunately, this is how the political game is played now. Make sure the other guy gets the blame. I'll be more "objective" tomorrow when we have a new State Senator named Shelly Moore.

Comment_arrow

Bewildered

10:04 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

H, yup, I agree... Other than having a new state senator (obviously). My fear is all future elections will be like all the recall races, on both sides. Until we vote down the muckrakers on both sides, negative campaigns are here to stay . Just wait to 2012. We ain't seen nothing yet ,

Comment_arrow

Thurston Howell III

10:04 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

I just hope I don't have to hear Sheila Harsdorf tell me about making the "tough" decisions, one more time. I guess it is tough to decide whether to be promoted the Koch Bros. "MacIver Institute, or the wild and Whacky "Tea Party Express" who have commandeered the traditional Republican Party. Lots of objectivity with both of these groups for sure.

Comment_arrow

Bewildered

10:08 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

H, a legit question for you without any hidden agenda from me... "Do you think the "mud slinging" is limited to only Repubs ?"

Comment_arrow

Bewildered

10:13 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

My last two comments were intended to be directed at Thurston, not H. Sorry ! My mistake .. Of course Ii welcome H or anyone else's thoughts too.

Comment_arrow

Thurston Howell III

10:15 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Bewildered: Answering that question is a "tough" decision. Can I make it tomorrow? :-)
I think you know the answer. It would be pretty silly to claim it was all one sided.

Comment_arrow

Thurston Howell III

10:27 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Now I have a question for you Bewildered? Why is it that Republicans can never seem to vote for the more intelligent Candidate? Are they threatened. Is it that they prefer someone who's "dumb like me? ( a generalization not directe at you personally )? I don't get it. Shelly has consistently proven that her answers are more thought out, more inventive, even more considerate of the other side. Yet she is demonized by you folks. Are you afraid of an Intelligent woman? or man for that matter in the person of Barack Obama. Obama is a bonafide Constitutional scholar, yet you have HIgh School Dropouts claiming he doesn't understand the Constitution? I had truck driver tell me 2 days ago that the problems in the world were because of people went to college? What's up with that? Now please don't go and point out the fact that I'm spelling challenged :-)

Comment_arrow

Bewildered

10:29 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Thx for the answer,TH. Yea, I was " begging the question". Neither side is showing alota restraint.

Comment_arrow

Shannon

10:50 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Ah, Bewildered's first personal attack against me came at 9:23 am. Kind of late in the day for him.

Ignore the trolls from outside SD10.

Comment_arrow

Bewildered

11:10 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

S, refrain from making inane comments like attacking HSO for taking paid advertising, and I won't respond. A little sensitive this morning? And this string was going so nice. I am not going to spend this beautiful day sparing with you. Find another target.

Comment_arrow

Shannon

11:41 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Let's ask Micheal, as Editor of Hudson Patch, what his opinion is. Micheal, should news sites carry political ads on them in your own opinion? Personally, I feel it alienates one side if both political parties aren't represented in ads, and most news sites wouldn't do it. Let's solicit others opinions instead of attacking someone who disagrees with you. Like grown ups.

Bewildered

4:56 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

WW, never forget the President's own budget failed 97-0. 97-0 ! He pitched shutout . Even the Dems couldn't support Obama.

Reply

jill

7:46 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

WW We should be thanking all of government for this. Standard and Poors statement says the lack of cutting spending and the deficit is the reason for the downgrade, it says nothing about not putting in taxes.(or revenues as you state)
It also states that it doesn't believe these idiots (most all of them)in Washington can agree to make the cuts that were promised in the lastest bill.I honestly say I can't blame them, Dave Ramsey lessoned the numbers to some we can all understand. A family makes 58,000 a year and spend 75,000, they owe 327,000 to credit card debt. Their big plan is to cut there spending next year to 72,000. These would be the actual proportions of the federal budget and debt. See anything wrong with this picture? I blame most all of the members of government for this. We ALL need to make sacrifices not just the rich and the poor, the sick and elderly but everyone.

Reply

mjc

10:55 pm on Monday, August 8, 2011

They should just give everyone a flat percentage tax WITHOUT the loop holes George W. Bush wanted to give the super rich. They also need to quit giving our elected officials a full pension and healthcare benefits for the rest of their lives for only being in office for 4 years. It should be more like 20 or 30 years in office like most of us who have to work at least that long if not longer to get retirement benefits.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hudsoner

9:04 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

MJC
Would you really want elected people to be in office for 20 to 30 years? They would be professional politicians (and with Sheila Harsdorf we can see what problem that is).

They could prorate a full pension for the times one served, and anybody was recalled and lost, should not get a pension at all! private companies don't give pensions to employees they fired, and a recall is the political version of firing!

Comment_arrow

mjc

6:51 pm on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Hudsoner
I'm not saying that I think we should have career politicians. In fact, I don't, but that's what keeps happening, and they only need to be in office for 4 years to get these benefits. I absolutely agree with what you said!

Thurston Howell III

10:34 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Bewildered, Do you see any logic in the order these questions and responses appear here? Hard to follow the discussion when it jumps up and down? Don't you think?

Reply

Thurston Howell III

10:36 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Bewildered, I'll bet we have some common ground here. Raise your hand if you going to hurl, when you get one more phone call, one more attack flyer in the mail, one more person knocking on your door right in the middle of your dinner? Hand is up!

Reply

Bewildered

10:43 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Both hands high in the air buddy. Both hands !!! ( and maybe a single finger ...and I don't mean we are #1 ))

Reply

Thurston Howell III

10:51 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Bewildered, I have to move on to other things in my life but can I give you a challenge? Or a challenging task. Try to find a Wikipedia page for the MacIver institute. ( That sunshine pages doesn't count). I'll check back later expecting results. ;-)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bewildered

10:57 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Any other sources? I find Wiki to be loaded with bogus info. That's why schools don't allow it to be cited as a source.

Bewildered

10:56 am on Tuesday, August 9, 2011

TH, would take much to much effort to type out an answer to why Repub think the way we do. Think my position and thought process on Patch has been pretty clear
about what I believe in. Let's just say at this late date, we agree to disagree. I will say two things, I believe in my country, my state, my family and my God. I am an American first, not a Dem, Repub, Indy or TPer. Second, I think both sides on Patch have " demonized" both candidates. It's not just a Repub thing. Don't deny Repub ( and I) go overboard, but as I see it, it's pretty even on both sides. We all need a cooling off "time out". Don't look now, but we are having an intelligent civil conversation without name calling. I like it,

Reply

Leave a comment