Municipal Judge Finds Left of Center Managers Guilty in Drug Paraphernalia Case; Defense Planning to Appeal

The City of Hudson has won the first round of legal action in its drug paraphernalia case against two Left of Center managers, but the defense attorney said he plans to file an appeal to have the case decided in St. Croix County Circuit Court.

The City of Hudson has won the first round of legal action in its drug paraphernalia case against two local smoke shop managers.

City of Hudson Municipal Judge Susan S. Gherty issued a 16-page decision on Wednesday afternoon finding both Melissa Daniels and Brian Orcutt, managers of Left of Center, guilty of 25 counts of . Each citation carries a fine of $240. Together, the two managers have been fined $12,000.

The following is the conclusion of Gherty's 16-page decision (attached):

City of Hudson Ordinance §118-2 is explicit and precise in its language.  The evidence is likewise clear, convincing and satisfactory and established that exhibits 7 through 31 conform to the definition of drug paraphernalia as set forth in the ordinance. 

The defendants are found guilty on all 25 counts and ordered to pay forfeitures of $240 per citation for a total of $6000 per defendant.

"I agree with the judge's findings and believe she took a common-sense approach in making her decision," said Max Neuhaus, the attorney who represented the city in the case.


  • Hudson Police Issue 52 Drug Paraphernalia Citations to The Hideaway Smoke Shop

Options for Appeal

Neuhaus said the defendants have a few options to keep the case alive.

"When a municipal court finds a defendant guilty, the defendant has a right to appeal to the circuit court, which must be granted," he said.

According to Neuhaus, the defendants can opt for a new trial with a St. Croix County Circuit Court judge deciding the matter or a new trial with a six-person jury deciding the matter in circuit court. They could also have a circuit court judge simply review a transcript of the municipal court trial and issue a decision on the case.

Defense attorney Andrew Nelson hasn't yet decided which of the three options is best for the two defendants, but he has every intention of filing an appeal.

Defense Attorney Reaction

"I'm pretty frustrated with the decision. The decision kind of speaks for itself." Nelson said. "The judge essentially found that of the 14 categories and factors that courts consider in defining whether an item is or is not paraphernalia, nearly all of them fell in favor of the defense. The ones that didn't, I don't understand how a logical assessment of the facts and evidence would find that there was proof that was clear, convincing and satisfactory."

Nelson pointed out that the judge's decision established that somehow the items in question were legal to possess, but not to sell.

"There's a reason why we have appellate review in any state or federal court," Nelson said. "It's because sometimes the judges in charge of making these decisions just plain don't make the right decision. And I don't think the judge made the correct decision, so we will appeal to the circuit court. That's our next step."

Nelson has 20 days to file his appeal.

Legal Costs Mounting for City

This municipal court trial could be just the beginning of costly litigation for the City of Hudson. If Daniels and Orcutt file an appeal, they could force the city to spend for Neuhaus' services in a circuit court jury trial. 

Also pending are municipal court trials for Left of Center Inc., The Hideaway LLC and the manager of The Hideaway — all of which are clients of Nelson.

A manager at The Hideaway was hit with 52 citations in a similar situation in January.

"And then, any time there is a new product or new item that comes out, there's going to have to be a trial on it to determine whether or not it's drug paraphernalia," Nelson said. "At the heart of this matter is that the police chief is picking and choosing what he decides is drug paraphernalia or not."

According to City Administrator Devin Willi, the city has spent $23,532 on Neuahus' legal fees for the case against Daniels and Orcutt starting in September 2012 just through January 2013. 

"The city is going to spend a lot of money litigating this, and for what purpose?, to what end?," Nelson said. 

Nelson said he found it strange that the city would opt to move forward with municipal trials against other defendants before the a decision has been reached in the Orcutt-Daniels appeal.

"Now we've got Rodli, Beskar, Krueger & Pletcher advocating for additional trials and continuing the case to pad their pockets," Nelson said. "It seems bizarre that they wouldn't have taken the Hudson Police chief's advice and gone forward on the tickets against the entity rather than wasting everybody's time on three separate trials."

Despite city budget difficulties, Hudson Mayor Alan Burchill isn't concerned with the amount of legal fees spent on the case so far.

"I don't think we're going to reduce any city services as a result of this," Burchill said. "The purpose of this ordinance is to protect the citizens of Hudson, not to harm them."

Hudson Police Chief Marty Jensen could not be reached for comment for this article.

Like us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter | Sign up for our daily newsletter

T N T February 24, 2013 at 02:12 PM
@colonial mustard. I am curious if u can give examples of how the st. Croix cty Republican party is high jacked by the tea party. Also please explain the politics behind the council and county board. You have passed a lot of judgment here. Just looking for facts to back up your statements
Paine Reliever February 24, 2013 at 06:37 PM
@tnt, interesting that you bemoan the constitution protecting privacy rights when commenting above regarding surprise locker checks. Would you use that same constitution (2nd amendment) to argue against an assault weapons ban? Pipes don't get people high, people get people high. Who are the city council members that support the mayor in waiting our money? How much will they spend before they become "concerned?"
Colonel Mustard February 25, 2013 at 05:34 AM
Rather than name specific individuals which would be rude I can suggest that you do some digging and check out the attendees at the recent TEA Party events which have been held in Lakefront Park; where the large motor homes from the TEA Party Express and other related organizations have been parked. If you compare those names with the namess of officers of the local Republican Party and those of local TEA Party organization you might be surprized at what you find. It's all available with a bit of Google searching. You might want to throw in some Face Book research also.
The Observer February 27, 2013 at 10:55 PM
It's hilarious that the managers at Left of Center are blaming the city for the misuse of 23k in legal fees when it's the actions of the managers that led to the prolonged court battle in the first place. The LOC managers obviously don't know the phrase "cut your losses". If a cop gives a person a warning, the person should be grateful. Purposely disobeying the cop in hopes of changing the law is as stupid as it is hopeless. If the managers would have simply cut their losses and accepted their fate the 23k in legal fees wouldn't exist, not to mention LOC's legal fees. Bringing this to the circuit court will waste even more taxpayer money and LOC's money, further proving that those managers don't understand how to "cut their losses". They are wasting taxpayer's money and they have no shame in doing so.
juztyn July 12, 2013 at 08:21 PM
LOC obviously doesnt care how much its going to cost. it is a battle they are willing to fight. how long will the mayor and city council continue to waste the tax payers money is the real issue here


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »